H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Isabelle Demongeot are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1992 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Isabelle Demongeot #62 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Jun 27, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Amy Frazier #20 6-1 6-4 Isabelle Demongeot #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,850 119 156 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,609 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1988 19–18 51.4% #45 1,774 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,771 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,705 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,690 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,629 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,593 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,542 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,547 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,530 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —