H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-2
Iva Majoli holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1998 Philadelphia third round 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1998* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Amy Frazier | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-0 6-2 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1993* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-3 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amy Frazier | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |