H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Jana Kandarr H2H: 0-1
Jana Kandarr holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Kandarr leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Kandarr won the 2001 Stanford fourth round 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2001* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jana Kandarr | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,641 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amy Frazier | Jana Kandarr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |