H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Jo Durie H2H: 0-1

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #86 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data Jun 19, 1991* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 1976 5–6 45.5% 1,503 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% 1,602 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1978 15–9 62.5% 1,619 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1979 15–8 65.2% 1,713 0 3
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1980 21–14 60.0% 1,733 0 4
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1981 30–14 68.2% 1,859 0 7
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1982 25–20 55.6% 1,841 0 7
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 1995 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 +47 40.0% -0.80 1–0 +0.61 1975 1499 100.0 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 +0.55
15 1988 1637 125.6 +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) +0.73 1976 1503 107.8 +73 +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +3.14
16 1989 1717 128.7 +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 1977 1602 121.5 -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 +2.47
17 1990 1892 153.8 +24 -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1978 1619 121.0 +18 -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 1991 1813 142.7 +14 -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1979 1714 129.5 -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 1992 1844 151.1 +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1980 1734 122.7 -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1993 1845 143.2 +1 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1981 1859 136.3 -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1994 1904 156.1 +63 -246 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1982 1841 141.1 -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 1995 1877 148.4 +50 -219 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1983 2095 159.8 -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1996 1836 148.1 +37 -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1984 1891 136.3 +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1997 1819 152.4 +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1985 1800 133.3 +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 1998 1766 134.9 +18 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1986 1842 140.0 +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 1999 1877 154.2 +23 -198 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1987 1741 134.1 +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 2000 1854 148.5 +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1988 1703 127.8 -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 2001 1696 121.2 +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 1989 1622 126.0 -8 +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 2002 1758 137.9 -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 1990 1674 130.7 -60 +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 1991 1709 132.3 +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 1992 1689 130.7 -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 1993 1563 107.8 -11 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 1994 1555 106.0 +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 -0.60
34 1995 1548 107.6 +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 -0.20
Career 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 2101 141.6 -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.