H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Jo Durie H2H: 0-1

Jo Durie holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Jo Durie #86 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9