H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2000 Japan Open semifinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 52 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 2000* Japan Open WTA 500 SF Hard Amy Frazier #20 7-5 6-2 Joannette Kruger #61 Match data
Nov 13, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #36 7-5 6-1 Joannette Kruger #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,879 147 162 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,575 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,638 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,725 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1996 7–12 36.8% #126 1,646 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,791 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,721 0 2
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,650 0 2
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,659 0 2
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —