H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-1

Amy Frazier and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on carpet, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Oklahoma third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #27 6-1 6-3 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data
Nov 9, 1989* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 3-6 7-5 7-6 Amy Frazier #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — — — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,806 0 2
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,871 0 2
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,850 0 2
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1986 34–16 68.0% — 1,974 0 4
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,812 0 4
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,789 0 4
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,698 0 4
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,590 0 4
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,629 0 4
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,586 0 4
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,608 0 4
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —