H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 3-0

Amy Frazier holds a 3–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1999 Quebec City fourth round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Kimberly Po Messerli
Age 54 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 1999* Quebec City WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #20 7-6 6-3 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data
Apr 20, 1996* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-3 6-0 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data
Apr 9, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #18 6-2 6-4 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Kimberly Po Messerli — — — 1,878 118 133 47.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Kimberly Po Messerli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 5–4 55.6% — 1,568 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 14–16 46.7% — 1,655 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 20–19 51.3% — 1,776 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 11–17 39.3% — 1,701 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 4–13 23.5% — 1,609 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 20–13 60.6% — 1,806 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 27–20 57.4% — 1,789 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1998 11–15 42.3% — 1,742 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1999 6–13 31.6% — 1,653 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2000 0–2 0.0% — 1,611 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —