H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 4-2

Amy Frazier holds a 4–2 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Kristina Brandi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2006 Hobart International round of 16 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main-draw meetings
Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #52 7-6(3) 6-3 Kristina Brandi #78 Match data Jan 13, 2006* R16 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #23 6-4 6-1 Kristina Brandi #46 Match data Sep 2, 2004* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amy Frazier #57 2-6 6-0 7-5 Kristina Brandi #63 Match data Jan 23, 2004* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Kristina Brandi #73 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(6) Amy Frazier #60 Match data Jan 9, 2004* R16 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kristina Brandi #47 4-6 6-2 7-5 Amy Frazier #23 Match data May 24, 2001* R32 Madrid Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amy Frazier #21 7-6(1) 6-0 Kristina Brandi #35 Match data Jul 28, 2000* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Kristina Brandi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Kristina Brandi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 26/91 of Kristina Brandi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Kristina Brandi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/44 0.0 2.0 68.9% 53.9% 46.7% 54.6% 44.8% 51.1% 42.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/27 0.2 2.7 71.1% 54.4% 43.5% 56.7% 32.6% 51.4% 47.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/18 0.4 3.6 68.2% 53.7% 43.6% 43.3% 45.7% 50.6% 38.6%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2007 2/2 0.0 3.0 76.8% 58.0% 36.9% 63.3% 26.3% 53.2% 37.5%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 26/255 0.2 2.8 70.0% 54.3% 43.7% 52.1% 39.5% 51.2% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Kristina Brandi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.