H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1996 US Open first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amy Frazier #22 6-1 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #57 Match data
Nov 8, 1990* Worcester WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #18 6-3 5-7 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Amy Frazier Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2
2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —