H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-0

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Amy Frazier #18 6-2 6-1 Laura Golarsa #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,575 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,619 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,706 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,513 0 1
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —