H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2000 Stanford third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 27, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #21 6-3 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #58 Match data
Feb 24, 2000* Oklahoma WTA 500 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #22 4-6 6-2 6-3 Lilia Osterloh #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —