H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Los Angeles fourth round 3-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 1992* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #18 3-6 7-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #20 Match data
Oct 10, 1991* Zurich WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #20 7-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #22 Match data
Apr 13, 1991* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #36 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Jul 15, 1988* Newport WTA 250 R16 Grass Lori Mcneil #9 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11