H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2005 Stanford third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2005* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #59 6-3 6-0 Maria Vento-Kabchi #73 Match data
Nov 2, 2000* Quebec City WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #19 6-2 6-2 Maria Vento-Kabchi #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,716 95 156 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Maria Vento-Kabchi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,629 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,653 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,535 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,537 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,534 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,512 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,714 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2004 18–26 40.9% #48 1,628 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,573 0 0
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,461 0 0
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —