H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 4-3

Amy Frazier holds a 4–3 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–1 on carpet, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Chicago round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #15 6-3 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Feb 10, 1995* R16 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-1 6-4 Amy Frazier #19 Match data Sep 25, 1992* R32 Tokyo Nichirei Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amy Frazier #26 7-6 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Nov 8, 1991* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amy Frazier #20 6-2 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Jun 30, 1991* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 7-6 6-7 6-4 Amy Frazier #17 Match data Nov 2, 1990* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-4 6-1 Amy Frazier #15 Match data Oct 20, 1990* SF Scottsdale Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #64 6-1 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Oct 28, 1988* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Amy Frazier Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1
1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1
2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 — — — — — — —
2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 — — — — — — —
2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 — — — — — — —
2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Amy Frazier Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Amy Frazier Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02
1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30
1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83
1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05
1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41
1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.