H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 4-3

Amy Frazier holds a 4–3 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–1 on carpet, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Chicago fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #15 6-3 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Sep 25, 1992* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R32 Hard Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-1 6-4 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Nov 8, 1991* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #26 7-6 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Jun 30, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Amy Frazier #20 6-2 6-1 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Nov 2, 1990* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 7-6 6-7 6-4 Amy Frazier #17 Match data
Oct 20, 1990* Scottsdale WTA 250 SF Hard Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-4 6-1 Amy Frazier #15 Match data
Oct 28, 1988* Indianapolis WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #64 6-1 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Amy Frazier Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1
1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1
1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1
1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1
1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1
1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1
1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1
2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1
2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1
2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —