H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-6

Martina Hingis holds a 6–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 5–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2001 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #28 Match data
Aug 12, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
Aug 5, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-3 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Mar 12, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Nov 13, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Hingis #1 7-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
Mar 21, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #34 Match data
Oct 5, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Martina Hingis #16 6-3 6-7 6-3 Amy Frazier #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2005 0–1 0.0% 2,020 5 40
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8