H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 1-2

Martina Navratilova holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on carpet, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Charleston second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Amy Frazier #40 6-4 6-4 Martina Navratilova #8 Match data
Nov 5, 1994* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova #5 2-6 6-4 6-1 Amy Frazier #14 Match data
Nov 11, 1988* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-3 Amy Frazier #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168