H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 2-5

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 5–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1999 Key Biscayne second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #34 6-3 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #46 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #68 4-6 7-5 6-3 Amy Frazier #37 Match data
Jan 14, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-2 7-6 Amy Frazier #39 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Amy Frazier #18 6-3 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Jan 24, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 7-6(6) Amy Frazier #25 Match data
Nov 10, 1990* Worcester WTA 250 QF Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #5 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #18 Match data
Oct 1, 1990* Tokyo Dentsu WTA 250 F Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #5 3-6 6-2 6-3 Amy Frazier #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —