H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Mary Pierce H2H: 4-3

Amy Frazier holds a 4–3 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2001 Charleston fourth round 7-5 6-7(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 20, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Amy Frazier #24 7-5 6-7(1) 6-4 Mary Pierce #14 Match data
Mar 8, 1999* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #8 6-0 6-3 Amy Frazier #33 Match data
Jul 31, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #11 6-3 6-7 6-3 Amy Frazier #36 Match data
Aug 9, 1996* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #23 6-3 6-3 Mary Pierce #13 Match data
Sep 24, 1995* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-3 3-6 6-3 Amy Frazier #17 Match data
Sep 3, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amy Frazier #21 6-3 7-6 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Nov 12, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #53 7-6 6-4 Mary Pierce #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —