H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Meilen Tu H2H: 4-2

Amy Frazier holds a 4–2 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2006 Charleston second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Meilen Tu #134 6-3 6-4 Amy Frazier #54 Match data
Feb 23, 2006* Memphis WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #54 6-2 6-1 Meilen Tu #135 Match data
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Amy Frazier #61 6-4 6-0 Meilen Tu #51 Match data
Feb 15, 2001* Nice WTA 500 R32 Carpet Meilen Tu #51 6-2 3-6 6-0 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Apr 17, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #35 5-7 6-4 6-4 Meilen Tu #138 Match data
Oct 31, 1996* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #27 6-3 7-5 Meilen Tu #150 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —