H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 0-2

Michelle Jaggard Lai holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Jaggard Lai won the 1989 Newport third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Michelle Jaggard Lai
Age 57 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 1989* Newport WTA 250 R32 Grass Michelle Jaggard Lai 6-1 6-2 Amy Frazier #38 Match data
May 31, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Michelle Jaggard Lai 6-0 6-3 Amy Frazier #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Michelle Jaggard Lai — — — 1,639 61 105 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Michelle Jaggard Lai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,459 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,442 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1987 8–10 44.4% — 1,511 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1988 9–16 36.0% — 1,516 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1989 9–16 36.0% — 1,500 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 6–12 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1991 3–6 33.3% — 1,525 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1992 3–4 42.9% — 1,555 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1993 14–19 42.4% — 1,576 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 9–16 36.0% — 1,559 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —