H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Min Tang H2H: 1-0
Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Min Tang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Tokyo semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Amy Frazier | 6-3 6-3 | Min Tang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Min Tang | #747 | #112 | 13 | 1,565 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amy Frazier | Min Tang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |