H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-9

Monica Seles holds a 9–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 7–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Charleston third round 4-6 6-3 6-0.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 9
10 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Monica Seles #6 4-6 6-3 6-0 Amy Frazier #51 Match data
Mar 25, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Monica Seles #8 6-0 6-3 Amy Frazier #21 Match data
Aug 9, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Monica Seles #3 6-0 6-2 Amy Frazier #37 Match data
Mar 23, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Monica Seles #5 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #32 Match data
Aug 15, 1992* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-0 Amy Frazier #18 Match data
Sep 21, 1991* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 SF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-0 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
Sep 30, 1990* Tokyo Dentsu WTA 250 QF Carpet Amy Frazier #16 5-7 7-5 6-2 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Aug 18, 1990* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Monica Seles #3 2-6 6-2 7-5 Amy Frazier #18 Match data
Apr 28, 1989* Houston WTA 250 R16 Clay Monica Seles #52 5-7 6-4 6-2 Amy Frazier #41 Match data
Oct 6, 1988* New Orleans WTA 250 R32 Hard Monica Seles 4-6 6-4 7-6(1) Amy Frazier #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8