H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 2-3

Natalia Medvedeva holds a 3–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Natalia Medvedeva leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Natalia Medvedeva
UKR Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Amy Frazier #17 6-1 6-0 Natalia Medvedeva #58 Match data
Sep 1, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Natalia Medvedeva #42 6-2 6-7 6-4 Amy Frazier #19 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Natalia Medvedeva #35 6-4 6-1 Amy Frazier #17 Match data
Apr 11, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #18 6-4 6-1 Natalia Medvedeva #37 Match data
Jun 21, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Natalia Medvedeva #99 7-5 7-6 Amy Frazier #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Natalia Medvedeva #387 #23 295 1,881 111 111 50.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Natalia Medvedeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #197 1,499 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1988 0–3 0.0% #317 1,473 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 10–9 52.6% #67 1,614 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1990 15–16 48.4% #56 1,699 0 1
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 9–10 47.4% #83 1,683 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 24–13 64.9% #23 1,870 0 4
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 17–21 44.7% #57 1,770 0 4
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 9–12 42.9% #79 1,694 0 4
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 6–8 42.9% #88 1,682 0 4
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 1–2 33.3% #388 1,661 0 4
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —