H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 2-2

Amy Frazier and Natasha Zvereva are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1999 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Amy Frazier #24 6-2 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #22 Match data
Jun 20, 1997* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Natasha Zvereva #36 7-6 6-0 Amy Frazier #31 Match data
Sep 5, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Amy Frazier #21 6-4 4-6 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #11 Match data
Jan 13, 1990* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Natasha Zvereva #18 6-3 2-6 6-2 Amy Frazier #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —