H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Amy Frazier holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1993 Sydney third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #20 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #179 Match data
Jan 11, 1990* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #32 6-4 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #141 Match data
Mar 3, 1989* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #37 7-6 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —