H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 2-2

Amy Frazier and Nicole Bradtke are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1991 Montreal third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 1991* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #19 7-5 6-3 Nicole Bradtke #60 Match data
Jan 11, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Nicole Bradtke #45 7-5 6-4 Amy Frazier #16 Match data
Feb 8, 1990* Wichita WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #29 6-2 3-6 7-6 Nicole Bradtke #70 Match data
Jan 22, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicole Bradtke #32 3-6 6-4 6-3 Amy Frazier #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,868 181 162 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,600 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,738 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,760 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 21–17 55.3% #47 1,714 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,757 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,705 0 2
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,786 0 3
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1996 6–10 37.5% #94 1,709 0 3
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,697 0 3
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —