H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 4-0

Amy Frazier holds a 4–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Vienna round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #38 6-1 6-2 Nicole Pratt #46 Match data May 21, 2004* R16 Vienna Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amy Frazier #41 6-1 3-6 6-4 Nicole Pratt #113 Match data Jan 15, 1999* R16 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #46 6-2 4-6 6-2 Nicole Pratt #100 Match data Apr 18, 1998* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amy Frazier #18 7-5 6-1 Nicole Pratt #350 Match data Nov 9, 1995* R32 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Frazier Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/138 of Amy Frazier's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amy Frazier Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
30 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1% 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8% 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9% 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8% — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Frazier Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.