H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 1-0

Amy Frazier holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Amy Frazier #50 3-6 6-3 6-3 Nuria Llagostera Vives #124 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 77 110 41.2% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,510 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,499 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,441 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,448 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,620 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,626 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2008 13–10 56.5% #68 1,620 0 2
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,559 0 2
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,564 0 2
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,548 0 2
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —