H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-1

Amy Frazier holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Chicago third round 0-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 1992* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #25 0-1 (ret.) Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Mar 1, 1991* Palm Springs WTA 250 R16 Hard Patricia Hy Boulais 4-6 6-4 6-3 Amy Frazier #18 Match data
Feb 22, 1990* Oklahoma WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #27 6-3 1-6 7-6 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —