H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Patty Fendick H2H: 3-0

Amy Frazier holds a 3–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1995 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 15, 1995* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #18 6-4 6-2 Patty Fendick #62 Match data
Apr 9, 1994* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-2 6-7 7-6 Patty Fendick #30 Match data
Feb 19, 1994* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #39 6-4 6-1 Patty Fendick #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —