H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 3-2

Amy Frazier holds a 3–2 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Sabine Appelmans leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1999 Filderstadt fourth round 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 8, 1999* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Sabine Appelmans #42 6-2 7-6 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
May 25, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Sabine Appelmans #39 6-0 6-1 Amy Frazier #14 Match data
Jan 12, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #16 6-1 7-5 Sabine Appelmans #24 Match data
Aug 13, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Amy Frazier #26 6-2 6-4 Sabine Appelmans #20 Match data
Apr 9, 1994* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 SF Hard Amy Frazier #26 7-5 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —