H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Sabine Hack H2H: 2-1

Amy Frazier holds a 2–1 lead over Sabine Hack in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Sabine Hack
GER Age 57 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amy Frazier #23 6-2 7-5 Sabine Hack #51 Match data
Jan 19, 1992* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amy Frazier #25 6-1 3-6 6-2 Sabine Hack #47 Match data
Dec 2, 1987* Buenos Aires WTA 250 R64 Clay Sabine Hack #234 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #202 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Sabine Hack #523 #13 577 1,996 180 135 57.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Sabine Hack
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1985 5–1 83.3% — 1,559 0 1
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 2–5 28.6% #262 1,524 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% #246 1,520 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 5–4 55.6% #146 1,561 0 1
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1989 12–13 48.0% #74 1,610 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 16–13 55.2% #45 1,632 0 1
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 17–15 53.1% #59 1,678 0 2
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 21–14 60.0% #35 1,777 0 2
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 30–16 65.2% #24 1,854 0 3
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1994 31–18 63.3% #19 1,831 0 4
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1995 20–16 55.6% #40 1,729 0 5
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1996 19–15 55.9% #43 1,706 0 5
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1997 1–3 25.0% #523 1,648 0 5
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —