H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1994 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sandra Cecchini #57 3-6 6-1 7-5 Amy Frazier #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11