H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Amy Frazier vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-1
Sandrine Testud holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 Scottsdale fourth round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2000* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 7-5 6-0 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amy Frazier | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |