H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-0

Amy Frazier holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 1992 Tokyo Japan Open fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #18 6-1 6-2 Stephanie Rehe #110 Match data
Oct 18, 1990* Scottsdale WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #15 6-1 6-0 Stephanie Rehe #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,000 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,471 0 0
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,824 0 2
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,965 0 5
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,968 0 5
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,766 0 5
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,744 0 5
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,758 0 5
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 — — — — — — —
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 — — — — — — —
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —