H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2002 Los Angeles third round 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #28 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1 Amy Frazier #59 Match data
Sep 26, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #47 6-1 6-3 Amy Frazier #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4