H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 5-2

Amy Frazier holds a 5–2 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1996 US Open second round 7-6 6-2.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tami Whitlinger Jones 7-6 6-2 Amy Frazier #22 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #15 6-4 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Feb 9, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #15 3-6 6-4 6-4 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Nov 4, 1994* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amy Frazier #14 6-4 6-2 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Feb 11, 1993* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-3 1-6 6-1 Amy Frazier #20 Match data
Jan 16, 1993* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #20 6-1 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Aug 16, 1990* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #18 7-5 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Tami Whitlinger Jones 1,786 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1989 4–5 44.4% 1,525 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1990 12–16 42.9% 1,577 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1991 17–18 48.6% 1,682 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1992 13–16 44.8% 1,645 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1993 13–19 40.6% 1,651 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1994 16–18 47.1% 1,729 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1995 19–18 51.4% 1,705 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1996 10–13 43.5% 1,697 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1997 2–11 15.4% 1,598 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8