H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 4-0

Amy Frazier holds a 4–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amy Frazier leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2005 Auckland quarterfinal 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2005* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Amy Frazier #26 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 Tatiana Panova #77 Match data
Sep 21, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Amy Frazier #53 2-6 6-1 6-4 Tatiana Panova #22 Match data
Jan 12, 2000* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #19 6-4 6-4 Tatiana Panova #38 Match data
Aug 7, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Amy Frazier #37 6-1 6-0 Tatiana Panova #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —