H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-3

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 3–2 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 US Open first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #63 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #50 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amy Frazier #73 6-3 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #55 Match data
May 26, 2000* Madrid WTA 500 R16 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #123 6-2 6-2 Amy Frazier #23 Match data
May 23, 1997* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #73 6-0 6-0 Amy Frazier #30 Match data
Oct 24, 1996* Canadian Indoor WTA 250 R32 Carpet Amy Frazier #26 6-3 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3