H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Amy Frazier vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1992 Oklahoma semifinal 6-4 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 22, 1992* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Zina Garrison #16 6-4 0-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #27 Match data
Aug 13, 1988* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Zina Garrison #12 6-1 6-2 Amy Frazier #119 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Frazier Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8 — — — — — — —