H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Amy Holton vs Cornelia Lechner H2H: 1-0

Amy Holton holds a 1–0 lead over Cornelia Lechner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Holton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Holton won the 1983 Tokyo Borden round of 32 6-2 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Holton 6-2 6-3 Cornelia Lechner Match data Oct 13, 1983* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Holton #300 #162 3 1,578 27 62 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cornelia Lechner 1,500 2 6 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Holton Cornelia Lechner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1982 0–2 0.0% 1,463 0 0
16 1983 0–2 0.0% 1,441 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,475 0 0
18 1983 10–17 37.0% 1,507 0 0 1985 2–1 66.7% 1,464 0 0
19 1984 6–13 31.6% 1,493 0 0
20 1985 9–16 36.0% 1,553 0 0
21 1986 2–13 13.3% #179 1,464 0 0
22 1987 0–1 0.0% #300 1,456 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Holton Cornelia Lechner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1484 97.5 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 +0.22
15 1980 1484 98.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.11 1982 1463 98.8 20.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.06
16 1983 1441 96.2 0.0% -3.25 +0.05
17 1982 1476 99.5 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.04
18 1983 1508 107.0 +12 +99 39.3% -0.93 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +1.83 1985 1464 104.9 66.7% +1.50 +0.07
19 1984 1493 112.4 -10 +69 36.4% -0.70 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +1.44
20 1985 1554 108.9 -21 -25 37.7% -1.28 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 +0.27
21 1986 1465 93.6 +10 +9 15.6% -2.63 1–1 0–2 +0.33
22 1987 1457 99.2 0.0% -3.00 -0.09
Career 1579 106.8 -4 +38 34.0% -1.29 14–16 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +4.42 1500 99.2 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 +5.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.