H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Amy Holton vs Ginny Purdy H2H: 0-1

Ginny Purdy holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Holton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ginny Purdy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ginny Purdy won the 1983 Pittsburgh semifinal  .

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Holton
USA Age 61
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ginny Purdy
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginny Purdy   Amy Holton Match data Mar 12, 1983* SF Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Holton #300 #162 3 1,578 27 62 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ginny Purdy — — — 1,667 26 36 41.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Holton Ginny Purdy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1983 13–8 61.9% — 1,652 0 1
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 1984 5–14 26.3% — 1,564 0 1
18 1983 10–17 37.0% — 1,507 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,532 0 1
19 1984 6–13 31.6% — 1,493 0 0 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,548 0 1
20 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,553 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,534 0 1
21 1986 2–13 13.3% #179 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1987 0–1 0.0% #300 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Holton Ginny Purdy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 5 5 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 25 33 24.2% 14 29 43 32.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — 11 14 25 44.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Holton Ginny Purdy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1484 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 112.4 — — — — +74 -86 — 55.8% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 105.1 +2.89
17 1982 1476 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.04 1984 1564 105.4 — — — — +90 -48 — 32.6% -0.93 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.4 +0.70
18 1983 1508 107.0 — — — — +12 +99 — 39.3% -0.93 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +1.83 1985 1532 95.6 — — — — +60 -28 — 35.9% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.3 +1.11
19 1984 1493 112.4 — — — — -10 +69 — 36.4% -0.70 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +1.44 1986 1548 97.8 — — — — +47 — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 1–0 — +0.41
20 1985 1554 108.9 — — — — -21 -25 — 37.7% -1.28 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 +0.27 1987 1534 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
21 1986 1465 93.6 — — — — +10 +9 — 15.6% -2.63 1–1 0–2 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 1457 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1579 106.8 — — — — -4 +38 — 34.0% -1.29 14–16 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +4.42 — 1668 104.2 — — — — +73 -43 — 41.2% -0.83 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 102.5 +8.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.