H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amy Schwartz vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-2
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1988 Rome third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 56
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1988* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 6-2 | Amy Schwartz | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1987* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-3 | Amy Schwartz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Schwartz | — | — | — | 1,558 | 14 | 27 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amy Schwartz | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |