H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Amy Schwartz vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Amy Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1989 Guaruja round of 16 6-2 6-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amy Schwartz
USA Age 57
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Noelle Van Lottum 6-2 6-7 7-5 Amy Schwartz Match data Dec 15, 1989* R16 Guaruja WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amy Schwartz — — — 1,557 14 27 34.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amy Schwartz Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 2–2 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 1986 4–2 66.7% — 1,541 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1987 2–5 28.6% — 1,511 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1988 2–7 22.2% — 1,481 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1989 3–5 37.5% — 1,484 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,449 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amy Schwartz Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1986 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 12 19 36.8% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amy Schwartz Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1985 1499 92.1 — — — — — — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.04 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 1986 1542 110.7 — — — — — +61 — 69.2% +1.00 0–1 — — +1.07 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1987 1511 99.0 — — — — +56 +40 — 26.7% -2.00 1–0 2–0 — +0.52 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1988 1481 113.3 — — — — +26 +65 — 30.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.18 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1989 1485 97.7 — — — — +34 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.77 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1990 1477 106.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.35 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1991 1449 96.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — +0.28 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1993 1449 94.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.83 — — — +0.15 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
Career — 1558 103.7 — — — — +37 +57 — 35.2% -1.42 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 100.3 +5.61 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.