H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 1-3

Ai Sugiyama holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ai Sugiyama leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ai Sugiyama won the 2009 Sydney fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Ai Sugiyama
JPN Age 51 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2009* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Ai Sugiyama #29 2-6 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 Match data
Mar 26, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Ai Sugiyama #40 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data
Aug 17, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Ai Sugiyama #29 6-4 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 Match data
May 18, 2006* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 6-2 4-6 6-4 Ai Sugiyama #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Ai Sugiyama #97 #8 2,400 1,951 411 362 53.2% 0 0 0 4 2 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Ai Sugiyama
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #184 1,477 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1993 3–8 27.3% #145 1,487 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1994 9–11 45.0% #72 1,557 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1995 16–17 48.5% #46 1,691 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1996 22–18 55.0% #28 1,738 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1997 31–25 55.4% #21 1,833 0 1
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1998 37–21 63.8% #18 1,859 0 3
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1999 27–23 54.0% #24 1,806 0 3
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2000 20–24 45.5% #32 1,687 0 3
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2001 28–25 52.8% #30 1,720 0 3
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2002 35–26 57.4% #24 1,755 0 3
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2003 44–25 63.8% #10 1,915 0 5
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2004 30–22 57.7% #17 1,802 0 6
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2005 28–27 50.9% #29 1,742 0 6
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2006 28–25 52.8% #26 1,742 0 6
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2007 17–21 44.7% #38 1,632 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2008 26–21 55.3% #31 1,742 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2009 9–19 32.1% #97 1,647 0 6