H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-4

Alicia Molik holds a 4–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alicia Molik leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-4 5-7 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alicia Molik #138 6-4 5-7 7-6(3) Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
May 25, 2007* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 6-2 6-4 Alicia Molik #60 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alicia Molik #66 6-3 5-7 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Alicia Molik #12 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #38 Match data
Oct 24, 2003* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Hard Alicia Molik #36 6-4 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,035 151 161 48.4% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2000 6–10 37.5% #115 1,552 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2004 37–18 67.3% #13 1,938 0 4
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,779 0 5
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,632 0 5
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,628 0 5
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2008 1–5 16.7% #308 1,577 0 5
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,561 0 5
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,584 0 5
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 — — — — — — —