H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Alona Bondarenko H2H: 1-3

Alona Bondarenko holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alona Bondarenko leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alona Bondarenko won the 2010 Hobart semifinal 4-6 6-3 6-4.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
UKR Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2010* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Alona Bondarenko #32 4-6 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #21 6-2 7-5 Alona Bondarenko #30 Match data
May 8, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Alona Bondarenko #25 7-5 0-6 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data
Mar 22, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alona Bondarenko #95 4-6 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Alona Bondarenko #1,151 #19 2,020 1,872 154 143 51.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Alona Bondarenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 2003 0–2 0.0% #187 1,472 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #110 1,482 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2005 13–16 44.8% #79 1,528 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2006 24–22 52.2% #32 1,689 0 1
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2007 33–24 57.9% #21 1,765 0 1
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2008 25–20 55.6% #33 1,785 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2009 30–25 54.5% #32 1,781 0 1
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2010 24–19 55.8% #36 1,732 0 2
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2011 4–14 22.2% #257 1,565 0 2
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11