H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2006 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #57 Match data May 25, 2006* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 4-6 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #30 Match data May 20, 2005* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amy Frazier #68 6-1 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #70 Match data Jan 16, 2004* R16 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues #64 6-2 3-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #44 Match data Jan 11, 2002* SF Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amy Frazier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 34/138 of Amy Frazier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amy Frazier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1%
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9%
Career — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8% — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amy Frazier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67
17 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93
20 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29
21 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72
24 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18
25 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53
27 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80
28 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74
31 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
Career — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50 — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.