H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Amy Frazier H2H: 3-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2006 Strasbourg third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 2006* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #57 Match data
May 20, 2005* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 4-6 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #30 Match data
Jan 16, 2004* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #68 6-1 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #70 Match data
Jan 11, 2002* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #64 6-2 3-6 6-4 Amy Frazier #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8