H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Catalina Castano H2H: 3-2

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–2 lead over Catalina Castano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2011 Bogota third round 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2011* Bogota WTA 250 R32 Clay Catalina Castano #200 7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5) Anabel Medina Garrigues #79 Match data
Jul 16, 2010* Prague WTA 250 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #44 6-4 6-2 Catalina Castano #210 Match data
Oct 24, 2008* Luxembourg WTA 500 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #22 6-2 4-6 7-5 Catalina Castano #159 Match data
Feb 27, 2004* Bogota WTA 250 R16 Clay Catalina Castano #142 4-6 6-1 7-6(5) Anabel Medina Garrigues #70 Match data
Feb 22, 2003* Bogota WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #528 6-2 7-6(10) Catalina Castano #199 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,703 83 109 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,489 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,513 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2004 5–8 38.5% #113 1,541 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,661 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,544 0 0
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,508 0 0
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,497 0 0
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,500 0 0
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,511 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0