H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2004 Amelia Island third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 8, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #25 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33